Wednesday, February 12, 2020

Clearing the Etowah

It was late spring 1994, North Georgia had been hammered by several tornadoes, clearing swaths of trees, destroying buildings and clogging rivers with acres of downed trees. I'd just moved back to my family's farm in Jackson County to build a house after four years of teaching Inupiaq children in the Bering Strait region of western Alaska. 
I received a phone call from Steve Hicks, my good friend and canoe partner in an aborted attempt to paddle from the North Georgia Mountains to the Gulf of Mexico in August of 1981, but that is another story. Steve related that the Chestatee and Etowah Rivers had tons of tornado debris in them and our friend Ben Lachance, who, with his wife Dana, owned Appalachian Outfitters and rented canoes for day trips on the rivers, was missing a prime chunk of his business season due to the choked river. Would I be interested spending a day clearing parts of the River?
After four years of shoveling snow, walking to work in 70 and 80 below wind chilled mornings, across drifts higher than my head, snow machining and skiing across miles and miles of frozen tundra and ocean, and swimming once in the frigid Bering Sea, did I want to spend a day moving some brush out of a warm, sun kissed Southern mountain stream? What do you think, dear reader?
Steve said he’d meet me at the canoe outpost, early the next day. I asked if we needed tools and he replied that Ben had everything for us. We left the farm, drove through Gainesville, across the upper reaches of Lake Lanier and up GA Highway 60 toward the mountains. Less than an hour later I was pulling into Appalachian Outfitter’s rental outpost on the Chestatee River, a couple of miles outside the home of Georgia’s historic gold rush town, Dahlonega.
After a round of handshakes and back slapping hugs with Steve and Ben, we climbed in Ben’s van. He’d already loaded a canoe and gear in the canoe trailer. He told us that the Etowah drainage had been hit hard by a tornado and there were parts of the river completely blocked. If we could open a route through the blocked parts of the river he could start running rentals again. He wasn’t sure how bad the log jams were in the less accessible parts of the river, but said he’d be grateful for whatever we could clean out. It sounded like an interesting day.
Arriving at the put in, we quickly unloaded the canoe, filled it with chain saws, gas cans, axes, a bow saw, our lunches, a couple of gallons of water, paddles, life vests, and our lunches. Too bad we didn’t have a camera in one of the gear bags, what we encountered and did that day would scarcely be believed by others in later years.
I’d taught Steve some canoeing basics back in 1981. In the intervening thirteen years his passion for whitewater and his paddling skills had far surpassed my own. He’d run and guided rivers all over the southeast and was a master paddler.
I took the bow, Steve the stern and to Ben’s hearty wish of, “Good luck!” we pushed off into the small, swiftly flowing river,
Steve joked that we’d likely be in for a tiring day.
Now I must reveal that Steve and I were both blessed with some uncommon physical skills. I was lean and muscular at 220 lbs. with many years of Olympic style weight lifting behind me. I was fast and powerful. Steve was even more of a physical beast. He was built like the classic powerlifter he’d been, with thick thighs and chest, a mighty back and shoulders, and arms that looked like he could choke a bull. I didn’t expect we’d find much of a challenge on the river that day. Oh how wrong I soon realized I was.
Within a quarter mile of twisted river we came upon a narrow set of riffles with several small trees leaning from the banks, limbs immersed in the water and tops bobbing in the small waves. The river was impassable for forty feet. We pulled alongside the gravel bar and grabbed the chainsaws. We quickly began limbing the trees, cutting up the trunks and tossing the logs and branches onto the gravel bar. Within a few minutes we were left with just a couple of trees down in the water. One was pinning the top of the other in the stream. After a minute’s discussion I ended up shimmying out a fallen tree hanging about six feet above the river with a bow saw, cutting off the tree top so that Steve could wrestle it out of the water and open the channel by a couple of canoe widths.
That done we headed on down the river cutting up fallen trees, moving brush from the stream, sweating in the building heat, laughing, talking about old times and our kids and life the last few years while I’d been away.
It was a beautiful morning with blue skies and a light breeze. Being out on the emerald colored river was intoxicating. We quickly fell into a working rhythm of removing limbs, then one of us lifting, prying or bracing the tree trunks while the other ran a chainsaw to cut up the dense hickories, oaks, and lighter poplars. Most of the trees were small only a few inches in diameter. A few were large, heavy old behemoths that took long minutes of finagling, pushing, lifting, cutting, and balancing to remove them from the river.
My respect for Sthil products grew by the hour as the saws took a beating being pinched and trapped by logs, pulled underwater, and dropped when one of us needed to escape large falling branches. It was a great day to be strong, healthy young men doing a crazy task with nothing but time to worry about. 
We took our lunch on some rocks near a small rapid, stretched out to rest a few minutes then headed on down the river. As we rounded a bend, there stretching across a gravel bar and blocking the river was a massive old red oak. We pulled onto the bar, unloaded the saws and began to work. There was a steel cable, maybe a quarter inch in diameter wrapped around the tree and other smaller logs nearby. We tried to unwrap the cable but had no luck. Before I could start to hack at it with an axe and Steve suddenly pulled out his Leatherman pocket tool, opened up the saw blade and with no problem at all sawed right through the cable. I was amazed.
  After a bit of limbing we were left with the main part of the tree trunk still in the water blocking the river channel. I waded into the moving water just over my knees and began to cut the two-foot diameter log. Steve took off another large branch from under the tree and without warning the rest of the huge tree settled into the river pinching and pulling my running chainsaw completely beneath the water.
Steve yelled, “Don’t, quit!”
Quick as a flash, he positioned himself between me and the gravel bar. In water just below his knees he shoehorned into an impossible position with his thighs under the log. He began to groan and lift with his legs and back. The tree moved imperceptibly. I continued to feed fuel to the submerged saw, with bubbles boiling from the exhaust port. Steve groaned again and shifted to get more of himself under the giant log. The log moved a bit and suddenly I was cutting wood again and moving the saw through the log – under the water. With a crash and a splash the log severed. I yanked the running saw out of the water, where it’d been running for nearly a minute.  Steve released the log and fell back into the river. We both dragged ourselves onto the gravel bar, exhausted and laughing in between our gasps for air.
After a few moments we worked together to move the large logs out of the water, cutting them into more manageable pieces. (The saw, which had been cutting underwater fired right up!)Then we loaded our gear and paddled on downstream, still laughing at the sheer audacity of the situation that we’d just gone through.
            The rest of the afternoon we spent cutting and moving more logs from the river, occasionally using more refined versions of our technique of one lifting a massive log to take pressure off a pinched saw blade while the other ran the saw, sometimes partially in the water, but never completely submerged again. It was brutal, back-breaking work, with hands and forearms cramping from hours with the saws and axes, and canoe paddles.
            Finally, late in the day, we entered a part of the river where the water slowed, the rocks were replaced by muddy riverbanks and old trees leaned far out over the dark, deep water. The river was deceptively calm, and silent. We paddled on enjoying each other’s company and the solitude of the river. We rounded a bend and there before us was the mother of all river blockages.
            Trees, limbs, and bushes of all shapes and sizes stretched thirty yards from one riverbank to the other. The jam was fifteen to twenty feet in width. Logs floated, in the quietly moving water, others were piled over their submerged brethren, tilted at odd angles to the water, with limbs running every which way. In places the logs were packed tightly enough to look like a raft. A raft you’d not want to step on.
We slowly eased the canoe up to the jam. Steve pushed the blade of his 58 inch paddle down into the water until his arm was elbow deep, shook his head at the depth and pulled the paddle up. We looked at each other with wide-eyed expressions.
            Steve whispered, “There’s lot of water moving under this thing.”
            “Plenty of stuff trapped under it too,” I whispered back.
            The shadows of the ancient trees added to the developing sense that we were in the midst of a powerful and dangerous piece of the Etowah.
            With another look at the jam and at each other. Steve said, “portage.”
            I nodded my agreement.
We paddled back up stream a few yards from the jam and ferried over to the muddy riverbank. We unloaded our gear and slipping and sliding up the six foot muddy bank we carried it above and past the spooky jam, then down to the river. We repeated the portage with the seventeen-foot canoe, reloaded the boat, and pushed off into the river. As we looked at the jam from the downstream side, we agreed that rather than risk our lives trying to manually clear that obstacle, dynamite would be the best option.
A half hour later, in dim light, after fourteen hours on the river, we were at the road bridge and there was Ben with his van and trailer waving to us and pointing to the take out.
In the evening’s gloom, with muscles aching and exhausted beyond all reason, we loaded the boat and gear and told Ben that his river was clear except for the giant, scary jam near the end.
He couldn’t believe we’d gotten so much done. As we told him of huge trees and running his chainsaws under water he shook his head and smiled.
I don’t recall where Steve and I ate on the way home that night. I just remember sitting across a table, two men exhausted and sore, nursing beers and laughing tiredly as they rehashed the events of the day.
Today, I’m recovering from a hip replacement and have another one scheduled. Steve is fighting his own health battles and we once more live at opposite ends of the continent, but there was a day by God, there was a day.

Fairbanks, Alaska
February, 2019

Friday, February 7, 2020

The Media and Us


The media, and by media I’m referring to the delivery of news in print, radio and television, has changed dramatically over the last 40+ years. I believe the media is a reflection of our society and the overriding purpose of any business in a competitive economy is to make money, to show a profit, to enrich the owners, shareholders and to the extent that it benefits those two groups, the employees of the business.
As much as we can sing the praises of media for informing us, educating us, and entertaining us, all of those things are provided in order to make a profit. Without that profit individual businesses or entire modes of media cease to exist, outside of museums.  Remember slide strips in elementary school?
How does media do this? How does it gain our attention and hold it in order to advertise to us and cause us to buy things? Let’s consider streaming services, television, and radio, since that is where the majority of folks get their news today.
When the first two forms of media began, the novelty of having information provided over the airways by voice and then later by picture and voice was of great interest to many people. This interest created an easy audience for sponsors to advertise to. Social psychology very quickly began to study the reaction of the listeners and viewers (potential consumers) to various forms of advertising and to various types of entertainment provided by the media. (Yes, dear friends, the news is entertainment, and it is profit driven.) Ferenc Mate in his book, A Reasonable Life, said that unleashing television on an unsuspecting North American public was tantamount to carpet bombing the entire continent with valium. So are we just gullible or are we victims of very clever, very well planned campaigns to turn us into over consuming two legged locusts, destroying the world that hosts us in order to satisfy cravings created by media based advertising?
That is a question I ponder daily.
So what happened to make the news less reliable and in some cases more biased? We humans seem to have a need to find more, newer and different stimulation frequently. The old adds become commonplace and loose their power to captivate and stimulate. This occurs to one degree or another in all aspects of our lives from education, to politics, sex, food, and especially in the realm of entertainment. The typical horror movie of the 1950’s seems rather dull when compared to the modern version with all its bells and whistles added.
As people began to use computers, not just for work, but for entertainment, another type of media instantly began to move across peoples' screens. News services large and small, some just blantantly bias advertising for both conservative and liberal causes. 
The news has always been subject to bias depending on the accuracy of the information, the interest and motivations of the reporter and the purpose of the sponsors.
Despite this drift toward bias, sometimes unintentional, sometimes calculated, the ever increasing competition for our attention has altered the news so as to make a careful observer rightfully suspicious of many news broadcasts. The need to gain and hold our attention is the dominant factor in news broadcasting. 
When regular news stories are no longer enough to hold our focus, the stories are dressed up. They are sensationalized, humorized, made titillating, shortened, expounded upon, even altered. Media appeals to our emotions, our fears, our hopes, our frustrations, our desire to blame others when the world isn’t as we’d like it, and our desire to be entertained. We are told what we want to hear, often with a subtle twist that over time changes our perception of what is real and what is fiction, or what is acceptable and what isn’t. When we hear something that makes us uncomfortable, or that we don't believe we  can find a ready source of counter information, happy to have our attention and expose us to their advertising. Truth has become the casualty of the contest for our focus.  
Almost from the moment we are born we are bombarded with advertising for everything from fast food, to cleaning products, cars, toys, home improvements, medicine, and vacation spots. We become desensitized to this bombardment very quickly; so advertisers must come up with different, more extreme, or more appealing ways to gain and hold our attention. Just like any other program on the radio or, computer or television, the news must engage in these tactics in order to survive, to make a profit.
Conservative news sources, or those sponsored by conservative leaning advertisers, sprinkle their news stories with facts gathered to support their views and hold our attention in order to sell their advertisers’ goods.
Liberal news sources, or those sponsored by liberal leaning advertisers, sprinkle their news stories with facts gathered to support their views and hold our attention in order to sell their advertisers’ goods.
Some news outlets do a much better job of being non-biased than do most. These are becoming harder to find and hold less appeal for the masses
Instead of calmly discussing information and weighing its implications news commentators and their expert guests engage in hyperbole. They argue. They yell. They talk over each other. They distort facts. They give alternative facts. They even lie, often and over and over again.
Why are things this way? 
Because we will watch and listen to them. We find a grain of truth that appeals to our emotions and we end up swallowing the entire message because it is entertaining and we’ve become so desensitized to all the hoopla that we don’t have an opinion of our own. Often our core values become the values of those attempting to attract us to their show in order to sell us their sponsors’ products. This is done so insidiously, so frequently and over such a long period of time that we may not even realize how we’ve changed, because our emotions begin to convince us that only those facts that reinforce our feelings are the right ones.
So how do we escape this vicious cycle of enslavement to the over consuming society. Daniel Quinn, in his novel, Ishmael,  puts forth the idea that we can’t escape. He says we must participate or perish. I understand that argument, but I can’t use it to condone the sins of a way of life run amok.
Daily I must remind myself of what I believe to be true. I must ask myself what is good, what is honest, what is best for all people, not just for me and mine. I look at religion, not the distorted self-promoting version of so many modern churches, and try to weigh my life’s choices based on the ideas of serving others and ensuring that my choices do not damage the options of others. Of course I often fail. I am a product of this crazy North American culture of consumption and no matter how much I wish things were different I can only change a small bit of that culture. But I will keep trying. As long as I live I will seek to share goodness and mercy with all those around me.
Thanks for reading my thoughts. This was a first draft, a stream of consciousness writing; so I’m sure there are flaws and errors. It’s just my ramblings this morning.
 I’d be happy to read your thoughts as well. You can reach me at hadaway.bob@gmail.com

Peace,
                        Bob

Oh, here is a link to a source that rates news outlets as to their political neutrality. I was surprised by some of these selections, not so much by others. Make of it what you will.